the fall of 'rome'
or, the triumph of mechagodzilla.
as some of you may know, HBO has finished its run of 'the sopranos' and 'six feet under'. with 'sex and the city' a distant memory and its drama and violence factors sharply reduced, the highly successful cable network sought far and wide for a new show to fill the lacuna in its programming schedule. unfortunately, it felt that republican drama would be an ample source of ratings.
i'm not even going to go into the historical inaccuracies - the average viewer will neither know nor care. i'm a classicist, a romanist to boot, and i don't really care. what do concern me, however, are production values and entertainment content. 'rome' is deficient in both.
so, i missed the first episode. after having seen the second episode, i'm not crying myself to sleep over the fact. let's face it - i have a degree in this, i can fill in the gaps. but, that brings me to my first complaint: 'rome' suffers from the same problem 'troy' and 'alexander' faced - not particularly accurate from the historical perspective, but sufficiently complex to confuse the classical neophyte. a bevy of bland, togo-clad dudes arguing with a plethora of equally generic-looking, skirt-wearing soldiers - you're not really sure why they're all upset, but there's plenty of geriatric, dyspeptic hand-wringing to denote emotional turbulence. last night's highlight was, hands down, the brawl in the senate-house. canes and walkers were flying as pasty-faced british men squared off in their bedsheets. riveting!
what the viewer will have probably deduced by the end of the episode is that caesar has been naughty, and the politicians are angry. but, they'll probably side with caesar, since he has a horse, and all the senators have is emperor palpatine (creepy, seriously). cato's outfit was enough to send me over to caesar's camp - i saw old man nipple, and i was disturbed. for god's sake, we know you're trying to keep it real, man, but put on a burlap tunic or something. no one wants to see saggy, wrinkley, pasty old man boob. *shudder* but while we're on the topic of the politicians - it's nice to know that republicans were just as ultra-conservative, belligerant and stuffy 2000 years ago as they are today. you really feel the symphathy for their plight...whatever it is.
as for casting, the director sat down with a few jane austen movies and made some notes - 'emma', 'persuasion' and 'pride and prejudice' are all represented copiously. don't get me wrong, cicero was a pompous ass, but when i think sanctimonious, obnoxious republican, i don't think of the ridiculous mr. collins. well, maybe his comb-over. and let's not forget octavian: he looks like doogie howser, without the credibility. and he spouts some absolutely dreadful anachronistic idealisms about the evils of an economy based on slavery, the oligarchy of the nobility, the oppression of women etc. but don't worry folks, when caesar bites it, he'll adopt the patriarchal, power-hungry mantel of his forebearers, enslaving cities and crucifying thousands along the way. a true roman hero!
and finally, since this is HBO after all, full-frontal nudity and gratuitous sex abound. all that killing and speechifying really works up the urge to DO IT. often. sometimes during the killing and speechifying.
perhaps you're wondering about the rubric at the head of the blog. after the painful visit in 'rome', we flipped over to cbc and caught the latter half of a bad japanese flick. mechagodzilla and titanosaurus teamed up with asian aliens to face off against asian elvis impersonators sporting bad british accents. oh yeah, and there were some cyborgs too. tokyo seemed all but lost, until it was saved by the fortuitious entrance of godzilla. because, as steve so aptly put it, godzilla is like a jealous ex-boyfriend: if he can't destroy tokyo, no one can.
the verdict: mechagodzilla - 1, rome - 0.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1a42/c1a42f2f6480d6ffdbde9dd58c246d3291bb8d8b" alt="Image hosted by Photobucket.com"
6 Comments:
Is it just my browser or do you not use CAPITAL letters? Maybe its a formatting issue?
I have to disagree with you on your assesment of HBO's Rome however. You may have a degree on it, but any amateur with Google can find sites like Roman-Empire.net which spells out in great detail the incremental steps that occured between Caesar decided to move from Gaul and march on Rome.
What HBO's ROME has done right is its attempt, and I would say a successful one, of throwing out Hollyrome. There's no cult of personality around any of the main historical giants and Caesar is just this general with a horse, as you so aptly put it.
The most puzzling thing for me though is how someone with a degree on 'it' could be lost in the plot. Maybe you're just trying to nail home the point that you didn't like it, but most people who liked it, or didn't like it so much, grasp the story quite easily. But then agian, cultural elitists who write negative reviews usually feign confusion over plot and or boredom as an excuse to give a cultural product a bad review.
It's too bad though that you found Godzilla more interesting that Rome. As much as I love Godzilla (I grew up watching all of films), I can't help but find it ironic that while the CBC is out on strike and on its best days is incapable of co-producing a series like Rome, the BBC is more than eager to fund this project.
hey kitten, maybe you missed my comment from early january in which i indicated that i do not use capital letters...because i'm lazy. ellipses and assorted punctuation are okay, however.
as for the plot, thanks for asking, and yes, i got it. my cronies and i have all read our caesar, cicero, cassius dio, tacitus, suetonius and plutarch (in the original greek and latin), so the various subtleties escaped us not. however, some of our less erudite companions missed out, and required a little extra explanation - hence my suggestion that perhaps the plot was a bit murky for the uninitiated.
i do maintain that HBO could have done a better job. the character treatment is sterile and the plot development is as shallow as the rubicon. the fine british production 'i, claudius', based on robert graves' book of the same name, was in turn based on the most sensational and least credible ancient historians, but despite the dubious historical pedigree, managed to be one of the best and most entertaining depictions of roman history. certainly no hollyrome.
but what do i know? i'm just a grad student with too much time on her hands. but i'll be tuning in next week in the hope that i'm proved wrong.
Monkey Dew should change it's name to Monkey Butt!!!! This is for comments not essays. Get your own blog. I thought the show was just plain lame..I just wanted to be entertained. Must have been a Canadian production.
well, there you have it. the general public is not entertained. and for my part, i think the quality of cbc broadcasting has been improved by the strike. i'll take godzilla over canadian content any day.
but monkey dew does have a point - i am being belligerant for its own sake. better than studying for the dreaded german comp! and monkey dew does have his own blog...which i'm now reading, also in the spirit of procrastination.
i think that anything that is produced by hollywood and involves the classical world is bound to be a disappointment. troy, alexander, and now rome, back up my point. though recently i was in toronto and saw an advertisement for "proteus", i was intrigued and promptly back tracked to get a proper gander at the poster. turns out that "proteus" is one of most challenging (or whatnot) gay film of recent times. well, that's what the film studio says about it. i'm still trying to see how gay film and a sea god go together. maybe we should make that the classics movie night feature! hehehe, wonder how'd that go over?
My friend, I found your blog very entertaining and informative. Every 'historical' movie pumped out by Hollywood is worse than the last one. You never bore me, especially with your use of intelligent wording. But who's version of Rome was worse ABC's or HBO's?
Now there's a debate.
Post a Comment
<< Home